Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Body jokes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Body jokes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inherently unencyclopedic list inviting people to "add below any body jokes your body has" Shadowjams (talk) 23:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Handschuh-^{talk to me} 01:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated for speedy but with the additons of reference we have to go this way. Delete for being utter bullshit. Non Encyclopedic and brings nothing to the table to improve. Sorry if this is mean, juswt being honest. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 04:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm with you on this article. But be aware that "nonsense" is generally regarded to mean things like "alsdkfjalskdjfalskdj" and not "colorless homes manically menacingly pride". The CSD criteria are the subject of intense debate. I would add though, that I believe it would be very problematic for someone, especially an admin, to decline a speedy that is "nonsense" when in fact it's an obvious "no context", on the grounds that the person used G1 instead of A1. Shadowjams (talk) 06:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and may I suggest the new CSD db-wtf, since the article does contain English words in parseable sentence structures: c.f. Colorless green ideas sleep furiously. MuffledThud (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with Hell in a Bucket. While some sources relating to "quantum healing" and such have now been added, none of them seems to validate the notion of "body jokes," which reads like original research if not outright nonsense. --MelanieN (talk) 05:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]
Delete. Cite WP:YOURESHITTINGME....or WP:SYNTH if you want. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.