Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BodyKom
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. KTC (talk) 21:03, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- BodyKom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. LT90001 (talk) 21:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems to be only commercial PR puff. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC).
- Keep. A quick Google search reveals a number of secondary sources. The article as it stands is terrible, but that's a reason for improvement, not deletion. PianoDan (talk) 15:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 03:42, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:49, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - Meets notability criteria for inclusion. Added some reliable sources to the EL section of the article. ~KvnG 17:24, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - Meets GNG, although perhaps not by a gigantic margin (at least per sources available online); see the article for some sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:20, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.