Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodhtree (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bodhtree

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous deletion discussion closed as no consesus per WP:NPASR. This company clearly fails WP:CORPDEPTH, as the only secondary sources are press-release-y in nature or fleeting mentions. The only "in depth" article is super promotional and on a website well known to operate as a pay for review site. Deleted as non-notable in 2010. agtx 17:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I'm thankful for the notification, I saw this earlier as it is too, I still confirm my earlier Delete vote as this is still blatant advertising and the article itself is full of publications we know for a fact are only paid-for news publications, hence not independent or confident to be genuine, hence delete, because WP:NOT policy applies (something we have used and should still use as it's important). SwisterTwister talk 23:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Additional search options provided below. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete -- Restating my comments from the prior AfD: "CIO Review linked above is generally non-RS (if I'm not mistaken it's pay-per-play or close to it). Best of Andhra Pradesh: a salute to the spirit of the state is clearly a promotional vehicle for local business development. I saw some local coverage, but that's about it. This company appears to be an unremarkable IT consultancy as the article does not provide any indications of notability." In summary, this is a WP:MILL business and its article does not provide any value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment − Please always use Google custom search engines to find India-related news articles – see here for more details. e.g., in the present case, look here. BTW, the above company has received some coverage in the reliable independent sources, e.g. Mint—[1], [2]; Business Line—[3]; Firstpost—[4]; The Financial Express (India)—[5], [6], [7], [8], etc. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:41, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all of these are press releases. agtx 06:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I wrote "some coverage". Anyway, the purpose of my comment was to give the link of the appropriate search engine. - NitinMlk (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.