Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodhisattwar Bodhbuddhi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SouthernNights (talk) 20:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Bodhisattwar Bodhbuddhi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Bodhisattwar Bodhbuddhi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Currenly a non-notable show, but can become a notable show in the near future if reliable sources turn up. Currently a WP:BEFORE search shows us one or two sources which are highly unreliable. So currently the show fails WP:GNG Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 01:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 01:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
• Keep: I found some reliable sources after searching in Bengali and searching by the spelling 'Bodhisattwor Bodhbuddhi'. So I think should be kept. Shinnosuke15, 14:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
  • If the decision is 'keep', I suggest the page to be moved to Bodhisattwor Bodhbuddhi. Shinnosuke15, 15:06, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

• Keep: The TV soap now passes WP:NTVLOCAL and has sufficient WP:RS 150.107.146.164 (talk) 12:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

• Delete: non-notable TV series. ––FormalDude talk 18:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

• Delete: per nominator, and mainly bacause it is yet to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTV. Happy editing. 43.252.248.25 (talk) 03:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

• Keep The show has now charted in Top 10 BARC Viewership of TRP (rank 7 for week no 27) and clearly passes WP:NTV and WP:GNG with sufficient WP:RS 42.106.205.218 (talk) 12:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

References

•  Question: Itcouldbepossible Don't you think the TV show has become notable since it has charted in BARC TRP ratings of 10 as of today (14/06/2022 IST week 27)? Also, the article is now many reliable newspaper sources. I would request to re-evaluate your nomination. 42.106.205.218 (talk) 13:18, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.