Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodhi Rook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Rogue One. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bodhi Rook

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor Star Wars character. Plot summary + tiny receptions section based on few mentions in passing in movie reviews; my BEFORE shows nothing better. Recommend redirecting to List of Star Wars characters per WP:ATD. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Film. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rogue One - Supporting character who only appeared in a single movie, whose role in the plot and casting information is already covered in the main article for that movie. As stated by the nom, the reception section is actually made up of reviews and coverage of Rogue One, in which small mentions of the character within that general coverage of the film is being cherry picked out. Additional searches do not turn up the kind of coverage in reliable sources that would warrant an independent article separate from the main article on the single film the character appeared in. I strongly support having Rogue One be the redirect target over the suggested List of Star Wars characters since, as the characters only notable appearance, it is very likely the page that would be the most use to users searching for the character. Rorshacma (talk) 18:12, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Passing mentions that don't rise to level of WP:SIGCOV. Would accept a redirect, per WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.