Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Rock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Rock[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In addition to having no reliable sources in the article, Rock fails WP:MUSICBIO. Primefac (talk) 19:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 19:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 19:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not pass notability guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep he seems to be quite well known in the heavy metal scene. Adding a couple of sources to article, an article that has been up for years and that reads well, placing him in a number of blue-linked bands - but no sources on page. Maybe people who are into heavy metal don't do footnotes? Willing to reconsider my vote if someone who actually knows something about heavy metal weighs in persuasively. But it is easy to find articles about him in places like KNAC.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.