Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Hanson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Hanson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing actually suggesting for any applicable notability and my searches have found nothing better at all, there's literally nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - A non-notable hockey player who had a role in a notable movie. The movie is notable, granted, but I'm not convinced that the role was a major enough one to qualify him under WP:NACTOR. Fieari (talk) 07:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails NHOCKEY, fails the GNG, and certainly fails NACTOR, which requires "significant roles" in multiple notable films. Miracle was his only screen role, and he was far from a lead in that one. Ravenswing 07:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.