Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Caffey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Third Watch. — Jake Wartenberg 19:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Caffey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - non-notable fictional character, fails every notability policy and guideline. Otto4711 (talk) 14:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - sources do not provide enough to warrant an article about the character. Jujutacular ^talk_contribs 15:10, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sources exist.[1][2][3][4][5]"bobby+caffey"&num=10&as_price=p1&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&sa=N&start=10 Those are kinda slight. Someone with lexisnexis could get it up to GA pretty easily, though. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 16:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merely being mentioned in a source does not mean that the individual character is independently notable. Please offer some sources that are substantively about the character, not just sources along the lines of "Bobby Cannavale plays Bobby Caffey in Third Watch". Otto4711 (talk) 19:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Peregrine Fisher, but having said that, it doesn't seem necessarily unreasonable to merge this character into a list article. Jclemens (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I don't see enough for an independent article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, limited coverage, little analysis. Abductive (reasoning) 22:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or Redirect to Third Watch article. TruthGal (talk) 06:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment a whole bunch of Third Watch characters have been prodded for dleetion... 76.66.192.144 (talk) 04:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've started a merge discussion for all the various characters at Talk:Third_Watch#Merge_all_character_articles_together_onto_a_list. — 76.66.192.144 (talk) 04:16, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to an appropriate character list. Edward321 (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.