Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Reese

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:33, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Reese[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

County-level Republican party chairman who fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Sources used are: 1) search results from ancestry.com; 2) his obituary; 3) his entry in "Who's Who in American Politics", which has a much lower notability threshold than Wikipedia; 4) an unlinked "statement"; 5, 6 & 10) election returns; 7) proof that his brother-in-law served in the LA house of representatives; 8) dead link to a list of election officials; and 9) permanent dead link to his wife's dance school's website. GPL93 (talk) 13:51, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 17:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 17:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 00:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable from Who's Who in American Politics" bio and as party chairman in two parishes. ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.191.54.229 (talk) 18:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]
Note to administrators The above vote is most likely the work of banned editor Billy Hathorn. The IP editor has been blocked....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 02:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable local political official....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Laughable to consider party co-chairman in a small parish to pass NPOL, heck the state chairman of the California Republican Party was just deleted. None of the sources establish notability for minor local official and loser candidate. Reywas92^Talk 05:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.