Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluview

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (A7) by DGG. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bluview

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any sources to establish notability. Lakun.patra (talk) 14:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 14:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 14:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.Lakun.patra (talk) 14:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Like the nominator, I failed to turn up any sources whatsoever. Kolbasz (talk) 16:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.