Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Sky Analytics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Sky Analytics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. Most of the sources are unreliable. ChristinaNY (talk) 10:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ChristinaNY (talk) 10:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:04, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (As Creator): Sources are reliable. Times of India is a largest selling English-language daily in the world (per Wikipedia) and it has a dedicated article about Blue Sky, Forbes India article about Blue Sky is again dedicated and is written by Forbes India staff not contributor, As well as in Mint (newspaper) here and others. However Text can be edited if required to comply with Wikipedia guidelines. 1990ricardo (talk) 05:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not yet notable. Fails NCORP, because the article is merely a list of funders. DGG ( talk ) 15:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:29, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As has been said above, the article just completely fails WP:NCORP. The claim to notability here is that they raised money, and that just doesn't cut it. - Aoidh (talk) 06:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SERIESA. The only source that comes even close to WP:NCORP's criteria is the Forbes article (fancy that), but it's still slightly dependent. The others cited by 1990ricardo are dependent. FalconK (talk) 07:12, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.