Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Morpho Ayahuasca center (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:54, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Morpho Ayahuasca center

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination of a declined prod. This is an unusal one. The AfD in 2014 closed as "delete". The article was restored during by user:DGG during the subsequent deletion review for the purposes of discussion. The review upheld the result of the AfD. However, the closer user:IronGargoyle declined to actually delete it as the page had substantially changed while at DRV. Neither prod nor CSD G4 are therefore appropriate actions.

While I am not making a recommendation, I would like to bring to the attention of the discussion that the page has been severely butchered. All of the references have twice been deleted [1][2] and are still absent now. I haven't checked these refs in any depth, but at least some of them have at least mentions of the subject. All of the images were removed in this edit; imho at least one image of the facility would be appropriate in such an article, and would be beneficial to include. SpinningSpark 20:42, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 00:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 00:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 00:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 00:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment 1: I'm glad SpinningSpark brought this here, because it does need to be fully reconsidered. I'm not giving an opinion yet. I checked the history, because it seemed unlikely to me that Time would have done a story but nobody else. There were additional sources added after the afd by Kevin Gorman , which he never added properly, and were deleted as mere EL's instead of being expanded , I've restored them as "Additional References" . They consist of several substantial accounts ,including NPR and National Geographic. (I will expand them tomorrow if nobody gets there before me). They need to be taken into consideration.
Comment 2. The original article had extensive promotional material: this is a commercial shamanism center with a tourist cliental . A little of it seems to remain. DGG ( talk ) 05:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:16, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.