Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Line (Pittsburgh)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Blue Line – Library and Blue Line – South Hills Village merged to replace DAB. (non-admin closure) — JJMC89(T·E·C) 00:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Line (Pittsburgh) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a "duplicate" disambiguation page per WP:INCOMPDAB. Both entries at this dab can also be found at Blue Line, which makes this one unnecessary. -- Tavix (talk) 00:58, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix (talk) 01:00, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Common sense is WP:INCOMPDAB. We don't just create editing guidelines for no reason. It's just as easy for someone searching for "Blue Line (Pittsburgh)" to be taken to a section at Blue Line that lists both Pittsburgh Blue Lines (see: Blue Line#Pennsylvania.) -- Tavix (talk) 02:25, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No. Useddenim (talk) 09:45, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think that Boleyn's suggestion is ok. --Rpclod (talk) 10:39, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Boleyn, that's what I've been advocating this whole time. Check out the history of that page. It's been merged before, by me, BD2412 and Hoof Hearted and every time it was reverted. I figured taking it here would be the best place to get a binding solution. -- Tavix (talk) 13:02, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix (talk) 15:43, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix (talk) 15:44, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So the consensus is to merge Blue Line – Library and Blue Line – South Hills Village into Blue Line (Pittsburgh)? Useddenim (talk) 12:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Um, then someone needs to add a {{merge}} tag to those pages… Useddenim (talk) 18:44, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged. Lost on  Belmont 3200N1000W  (talk) 12:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I'm late on this, but I also vote to Merge and section-redirect to Blue Line (Pittsburgh). That page shouldn't be a dab, and there's enough material for both on one page. If I could decide which version to add first, I'd do it myself right now, and boldly remove the deletion tag. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 20:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to close

[edit]

Okay, the two articles have been merged into the disambiguation page. Does anybody want to close this talk page, so I can remove the deletion tag without any fear of rampaging administrators getting on my case about it? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.