Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue (visual novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 14:11, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blue (visual novel)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game with no reliable third-party sources. Atlantima (talk) 02:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Atlantima (talk) 02:47, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Atlantima (talk) 02:47, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No reliable third-party sources and no evidence to show notability. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 21:06, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Visual novels are released in Japan all the time. Not all of them are notable, either due to a lack of coverage, or due to a lack of popularity. Unfortunately, this VN isn't notable. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:58, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG in the absence of reliable third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage. --DAJF (talk) 05:43, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete seems to be non-notable; lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. I'd say it fails the WP:GNG. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) . 09:32, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.