Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blow & Drive Interlock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blow & Drive Interlock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Every reference is a press release or a minor notice., DGG ( talk ) 02:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So the "independent sources" that were added appear to be a press release posted on Equities.com, a mention of the company on a Bravo blog post because a reality star is dating the marketing director, and a Bloomberg listing showing that the company is a publicly-traded penny stock (being publicly traded is in and of itself not enough to establish encyclopedic notability). I think I'm still pretty sure we should delete this one. A Traintalk 21:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.