Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blossom (video game)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 19:45, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Blossom (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I was unable to find significant coverage of this game in secondary reliable sources. Delete per WP:GNG. Article was created by a person working for the developer as stated on the upload here. Odie5533 (talk) 18:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No apparent significant coverage in reliable sources. There is one independent source supplied in the article, but whether it is reliable or not we do require multiple independent sources to establish notability. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 20:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I would have suggested redirecting to Braintonik but it seems that article suffers from notability issues and I plan to see if it meets AfD criteria. As for this game, Google News provided nothing and, honestly, there are thousands of mobile games, not all of them receive significant attention especially if independent. SwisterTwister talk 00:25, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: As per nom. Deathlibrarian (talk) 14:10, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- (edit conflict) Delete as not passing WP:GNG - no reliable, secondary sources found. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 14:11, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 01:50, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. – Richard BB 15:00, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.