Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BloomingOUT
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus, defaulting to Keep. ELIMINATORJR 10:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
BloomingOUT[edit]
Seems to borderline importance i.e. a few years ago would never have made it in, but now the boundaries have been blurred who knows? It deals with a radio show making a splash in a (to be fair, reasonably-sized) community in USA. Moglex 21:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep: I'm not sure about notability, but there's a whopping 2,620 hits on Google (which is not necessarily a reason to keep, I know) - and seven on Google News: [1] (all subscription or pay-per-view, sadly). -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 16:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's a local radio show and podcast. It's not syndicated or anything like that. Not notable. Realkyhick 18:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I added Chicago Sun Times article which mentions the show and also a bit of context about Bloomington's surprising gay tolerance. Notability is not established by syndication, or lack thereof, by being local, or by being a podcast, but by non trivial coverage by independent sources. Scarykitty 03:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This sets a bad precedence for allowing very obscure local shows and pod casts to use wikipedia as a platform to promote their shows. I don't see it's notability.--Amadscientist 06:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep.Zigzig20s 11:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable - hits on Google news and article in Chicago Sun Times. --Belovedfreak 23:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as above Harlowraman 23:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.