Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Rage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deletion under criteria G7.

Bloody Rage[edit]

Does not meet guidelines for inclusion. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:11, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Doesn't meet notability guidelines for web content. Matt (Talk) 22:21, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bloody Rage has not been included in any independent sources, and has not won any awards. According to WP:WEB, most content on websites like YouTube, MySpace, GeoCities, and Newgrounds are usually not notable enough for their own article. Rtyq2 (talk) 23:23, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the general notability guideline due to no reliable sources coming from a search. Someone another 02:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I apologize. I'm the culprit behind this damnable article. If I knew how, I'd delete it myself. I forgot, all articles related to Yu-Gi-Oh the abridged series were removed, but stuff like that is permitted on sites like Yu-Gi-Oh wiki. This site is much stricter that way and I was up at 12:00 when I wrote it. Delete it plz and I'll be lucky not to go to Hell or get banned for this. Ghostkaiba297 (talk) 05:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Ghostkaiba297[reply]

Don't be daft, nobody wanders onto WP and is able to 'get' its complex nature straight off or even that quickly, it's an ongoing learning process. If nobody bothered to create and add to articles then there'd be nothing for anybody to read, so don't apologize or feel you've done anything wrong, thanks for trying. Someone another 09:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanx. I'm going to make sure not to add anything like Yu-Gi-Oh the Abridged Series or One Ring to Rule Them All (a flash video by Legendary Frog) or Potter Puppet Pals or anything like that. And to tell you the truth, the only reason I got an account here was to change part of an article that had a bit of misleading information. The concerned.ca article, where it said for the Stay Fit commercial that three kids were chasing an ice cream truck. I've seen the commercial, I even have it on tape, and there are four kids, not three. One of them is just offscreen most of the time. Ghostkaiba297 (talk) 02:32, 19 December 2008 (UTC)Ghostkaiba297[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.