Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Knuckles (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 15:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bloody Knuckles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this really notable? If it is, it at least needs a major rewrite perhaps from a child dev. perspective. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 19:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - As strange as this game seems, there are two sources which seem to establish some level of notability.
Weak keep - as per above. There are reliable sources quoted enough to establish the notability of the game. It might not rise any further but there is enough for it to stay. NtheP (talk) 21:21, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.