Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Red Throne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blood Red Throne[edit]

Blood Red Throne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Added what coverage I could find to Altered Genesis, but I'm not even sure that's enough for that article. Aside from possibly passing NBAND#6 (though I haven't actually checked into Tchort or Erlend Caspersen to confirm this), I don't see any criteria being met, and I cannot accept #6 alone for notability. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decided to nominate the album separately. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:04, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable and lack of reliable sources. GraziePrego (talk) 03:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.