Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Colony
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Blood Colony (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 17:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: lacks mutliple 3rd party sources, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 04:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 14:26, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep as the article has now been cleaned up and sourced per film MOS. It does now have coverage in reliable sources... but it is weak. I have tagged it for WP:RESCUE. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hopefully Mr. holcomb will become notable and some of this information can be included in his article. This subject does no appear notable per guidelines as there hasn't been substantial coverage. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- keep - Article in current form has sufficient sources to establish notability. Raitchison (talk) 15:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:22, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- plenty of sources, maybe it lacked sources when nominated. If so it has them now. Geo Swan (talk) 11:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.