Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloggers.SG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:03, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bloggers.SG[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. The external links in the article (which are mostly dead) are either lists of blogs in Singapore (most of which no longer exist), or non-independent primary sources. For what was supposedly a first-of-its-kind event, there seems to be little, if any, lasting significance. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 07:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 07:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.