Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bleed (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete It was already speedy deleted before under Bleed. Kungfu Adam (talk) 15:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-Notable. A lot of it seems like advertising, also there seems to be a lot of errors as far as Wiki-scripting is. Jamesbuc
- Delete. Non-notable, extremely POV article. This was apparently already deleted once. fraggle 10:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BAND; no evidence of notability; no sources other than their official website (not even a record company link). Walton monarchist89 11:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - vanispamcruftisement. MER-C 12:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.