Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blasto (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP as a notable failed game. Ryanjunk 15:08, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blasto (video game)[edit]

None notable game that failed. Trunk 18:40, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (^raves/_rants) 22:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The game was released by a major publisher (Sony Computer Entertainment) so information about it can be verified and it is therefore not NN. Additionally, the fact is failed is also not a reason for the article to be deleted, rather it should be expanded and include reasons for it's failure. Alexj2002 23:01, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep expandable stub. BryanG^(talk) 07:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this article is only 5 days old. Give it some time. --Cornflake pirate 10:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This game had a major media presence when it came out, starred the very notable Phil Hartman and came from a major publisher. It's also notable for having a very high media blitz:critical reception ratio. Obviously, it needs to be expanded, but that's not a reason to delete. Ace of Sevens 23:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it's a video game and as such is notable. Its failure, provided it is documented and sourced, is interesting and useful. Proto::type 08:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable game that has failed. Hoxxy 12:25, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.