Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blanca Blanco (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 06:32, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blanca Blanco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would have proposed speedy deletion under G4 as the article was recreated after being AfDed I don’t have evidence that it’s similar to the previously deleted article. All that aside: this actress isn’t notable, her biggest career highlight was defying the implicit dress code of the Golden Globes which gave her a blip of press (that’s not an act of notability), and the article is littered with problems. Upon deletion the page should be SALTED. Trillfendi (talk) 03:23, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:40, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:40, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I figured it was promotion but I’m frankly amazed at the extent of it. And they still manage to get paid for terrible articles. Trillfendi (talk) 05:58, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.