Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Geoffrion
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snowball delete Maxim(talk) 21:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Blake Geoffrion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Non-notable college hockey player. Notability is not inherited. Smashvilletalk 03:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:N. Antivenin 07:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I had originally {{prod2}} the article for the exact reasons the nom now states. Maybe Blake will be notable some day, but that day isn't today. PHARMBOY ( moo ) ( plop ) 15:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:ATHLETE -Djsasso (talk) 23:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep, for the reasons I mentioned in Talk in contesting the prod: "he's an edge case to be certain, but I think the combination of his being a potential fourth-generation NHL player, a US junior national teamer, and the first Tennessee-trained player to be drafted into the league pushes him slightly above the notability waterline." VT hawkeyetalk to me 23:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Definately see where you are coming from, but I think its largly a case of WP:CRYSTAL. Just wait the year or so till he plays some level of pro hockey then he can have the article. -Djsasso (talk) 23:39, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I would actually be somewhat surprised if he makes any roster outside of preseason...he's not exactly tearing it up in college. --Smashvilletalk 03:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Definately see where you are coming from, but I think its largly a case of WP:CRYSTAL. Just wait the year or so till he plays some level of pro hockey then he can have the article. -Djsasso (talk) 23:39, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions. —Djsasso (talk) 23:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If he plays professionally or wins the Hobey Baker Award, the page can be re-created. Patken4 (talk) 23:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The first paragraph does not argue notability per WP:ATHLETE, or even the general notability requirements, while the rest of the article is one giant if x then y statement that violates WP:CRYSTAL. He might be a borderline case, but he's on the wrong edge of the border at this moment. Resolute 23:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 23:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Sorry, but 0 + 0 + 0 = 0. In the first instance, notability is not transferrable or inherited; in the second, junior league players are not inherently notable; and in the third, there is nothing inherently notable about being from Tennessee. Ravenswing 03:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only thing notable about this fellow, is he's a grandson of Bernie Geoffrion & a great-grandson of Howie Morenz. GoodDay (talk) 17:46, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As stated by Goodday there is really nothing notable about him except who his Great-father and Grandfather was. This is like making an article for every Career AHLer. Jobes23 (talk) 19:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.