Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blades in the Dark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Passes WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 04:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blades in the Dark

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject appears to lack notability and the article has zero references. I suggest, if there's a documented connection to the designer or the publisher, the page be merged with one or the other, or both. Ewilen (talk) 05:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the article is coming along, with several citations by now. The game has won awards and has been independently reviewed at belloflostsouls; it was published in print by a reputable publisher after a highly successful kickstarter; I suggest that the nominator rethink the nom given the activity at the article page (which was a brutal stub when nominated, to be sure). Newimpartial (talk) 00:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - (Corrected from vote.) The citations added so far are simply references to the Kickstarter page for the game and an entry in rpggeek, a specialty catalog. The mechanical summary that's now been entered would best be included in a review in rpggeek, with the rpggeek entry cited at the publisher and/or designer's page in Wikipedia. Ewilen (talk) 03:23, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Um...you're the nominator; you shouldn't be !voting. Also, please sign your posts.Newimpartial (talk) 01:54, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the article needs work but the topic is certainly notable Euchrid (talk) 22:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Newimpartial (talk) 19:08, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.