Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blades (boutique)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:59, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blades (boutique)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable boutique, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 23:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:14, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:14, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just a shop. nn. Szzuk (talk) 21:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm hesitant, as there is plenty in the section on Rupert Lycett Green. But I think it really fits well on Green's page, and doesn't need it's own article. = paul2520 (talk) 04:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Green himself is notable, the shop isn't. The citations are dead/empty but for one to a book that I can't verify as I don't have the book of course. But, none of the provide cites nor searches of the web turn up anything of note about the shop other than it was owned/operated by Green. Nothing in the article speaks to the shop's notability, and nothing in it is of use to the Green article that isn't already on the Green article, except for the picture. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The picture would work well in the section on Green's page, especially since there is not yet a photo in that article. = paul2520 (talk) 15:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the image to the article :), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.