Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackstone Hall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blackstone Hall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article which makes no claim to notability and does not present multiple, independent, non-trivial sources. I removed a significant amount of "content" because it was total original research. It had absolutely no sources and should not be included/restored even if kept. TM

Merge the the UC article. No indication there are multiple reliable and independent sources with significant coverage needed to show notability for a standalone article. Edison (talk) 16:04, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N and WP:IINFO. PROD removed without improvement or comment. Some student dormitories are notable, but so many are not that they feature at #4 in the List of bad article ideas. This is not one of the notable ones. I'm not sure it was advisable to remove so much of the text before AfDing, but the full version can be seen here and does not add anything but gossipy trivia - we don't really need to know about the "amaranthine scene of cat-pee" in the elevator. JohnCD (talk) 16:07, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No claim to notability, let alone evidence of it. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This was another small hotel (for nurses) that the UofC bought and converted. Nothing particular is said about the architecture or history of this dorm in the Google searches provided above. Speciate (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.