Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black women and the United States prison system

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. See my recent close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prostitution and State Sanctioned Violence for a mini-essay on class projects. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:00, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Black women and the United States prison system[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

IP contested PROD: concern was that this article is in violation of WP:OR and WP:NOTESSAY. CU on the account links it back to a university, which suggests that this is a poorly implemented class project. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:10, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom. Looks to be a poorly written essay. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:23, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as we are WP:NOTWEBHOST for school projects. — fortunavelut luna 14:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - Parts of this could probably be included in Incarceration in the United States, Incarceration of women in the United States, and most especially Race in the United States criminal justice system#Black women. And it's not totally clear that the last link should really be a section in an article primarily about race, and not spun off into its own article. I mean, is race really that clearly the more important factor over gender? Seems likely that they're both important factors and that this is in fact a distinct topic that has garnered plenty of scholarly and journalistic investigation and is almost certainly deserving of its own article.

However, this ain't it, and right now is such a poor duplication of the black women section that it could arguably fall under A10, that is, if it wasn't a plausible redirect, which it is. TimothyJosephWood 15:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:59, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this appears to be another class project from a university out of Maryland. The current articles do not cover the intersection of POC, women, and the prison system. I'd move it to Black women in the United States prison system or something like that. Bearian (talk) 13:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and not encyclopedic Maugster (talk) 12:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not encyclopedic. WP:NOTWEBHOST for school projects. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.