Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Light Enterprises

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. L Faraone 01:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Black Light Enterprises[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated on WP:N and WP:V. Couldn't find independent sources for company within first two Google pages of results. Most results seemed to be either connected to this company or unrelated. Creating user now blocked for spam/WP:COI; see User_talk:Godtechmovie for more on the blocked user. All other edits to article appear to be routine maintenance. Mount Flatten (talk) 08:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC) (Edited by Mount Flatten (talk) 08:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (banter) @ 08:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (natter) @ 08:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (talk to me) @ 08:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as a failure of WP:COMPANY. It appears this 3-year-old orgnanization exists, and we can allow back when it itself becomes the subject of significant coverage in independent reliable sources (currently lacking). And, as many new users do not understand the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia, I am less concerned with the nominator's WP:ADHOM argument, a situation which will be addressed when this new user agrees to avoid creating WP:COI or WP:SPAMMY articles, and becomes involved in making positive contributions to topics with which he has no personal interest. I suggest also that the author read WP:PRODNAME and seek the changing of his username. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.