Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Knights Parachute Centre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 12:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Black Knights Parachute Centre[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability and article is unreferenced, source appears to be own website, contested prod. MilborneOne (talk) 22:06, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to just be a club of no real notablilty.Slatersteven (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (Original Page creator) - The article is only a stub. It is similar to many other stubs that have previously survived AFD. - Rehnn83 ^Talk 23:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Alternative (Original Page creator) - Could this (and other UK DZ's be merged into the article British Parachute Association - Rehnn83 ^Talk 23:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That would seem resonable.Slatersteven (talk) 15:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree it would seem reasonable as some of the other club articles dont appear to be notable either they could also be moved in, just need to make sure it is just not a list as at present. MilborneOne (talk) 17:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:53, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Userfy articles are built on substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. I don't doub tthat this subject exists (and it can be redirect to BPA where it's mentioned) but there's no indication it meets the WP:Notability guideline. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:30, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not appear to have the sort of substantial coverage in reliable sources that we can build an article around. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.