Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Crow Records

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Black Crow Records[edit]

Black Crow Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record label. Fails WP:NCORP. None of the existing sources discuss Black Crow Records, merely some of their releases. And they don't seem to have many notable releases at that. Though many of the discogs are blue linked, they aren't actually bluelinked to those albums, they're linked to other things of the same name. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 20:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 20:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.