Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bjørn Z. Ekelund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 03:00, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bjørn Z. Ekelund[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was requested for speedy deleted in April 2012, but this was declined by User:WereSpielChequers, with the rationale "I'm not convinced this would survive AFD, but I don't see this as meeting speedy deletion criteria". Nominated for PROD in February 2013, but this was declined because it was nominated for BLPPROD in May 2010. The PROD-rationale was "No indication of notability, fails the general notability guideline" which is still valid as the subject has not received significant coverage in reliable source. See also Talk:Bjørn Z. Ekelund for comments from April 2012. Mentoz86 (talk) 15:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find any significant sources independent of the subject. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Comment A prior BLPPROD is not a reason to decline a PROD. See Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion which says: "The prod blp/dated tag may not be removed until such a source is added, and if none is forthcoming within ten days the article may be deleted. This does not affect the regular prod process, which may still be used on BLPs, including BLPs from which the sticky prod has been legitimately removed." AllyD (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is this paragraph biography in a book to which the subject is one of many contributors, but I am not finding enough to demonstrate biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 22:51, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Look further - his team methodology appears to have been cited and used in at least one other study: Positive Factors at Work Page 45 2008 "TSS was originally developed by Bjørn Ekelund (Human Factors AS, Norway) as a tool for assessing cross-sectional teams in coaching processes. In the present study, TSS was used as a standard questionnaire measurement. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:18, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.