Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BizPac Review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 01:22, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BizPac Review[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable media site. Articles seem to consist of half article and half random tweets. Very little substance on the site itself. LionMans Account (talk) 17:07, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unfortunately there is no inherent notability for media outlets, though there probably should be. In the absence of that, however, we have to go by the GNG. All of the references here merely establish that the outlet exists. We don't have WP:INDEPENDENT references talking about BizPac Review, except one which is of questionable WP:RS. My BEFORE turns up none either. Chetsford (talk) 07:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:NORG; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:03, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: @SamHolt6: You recently contested a PROD for this article. Would you like to make an argument for keeping it?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott (talk) 21:35, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG, nor does it meet WP:GNG. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 22:57, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.