Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bivalve, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bivalve, California

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Durham calls it a rail station built at site of oyster farm. No evidence that it was ever a community and does not meet basic standard for notability. Glendoremus (talk) 18:12, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete Topos go back a log way here, and they consistently show only a couple of buildings by the rail line (which is long gone). The book of interesting placenames is hugely indiscriminate and not a good source of notoriety. Mangoe (talk) 13:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.