Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bittersweet: The Love Songs Collection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bittersweet: The Love Songs Collection[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable compilation. Kekkomereq4 (talk) 20:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this album. Joe Chill (talk) 22:11, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question - same procedural question as here. I would lean toward Delete on this one. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 01:42, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Cher is unquestionably a notable artist. If her bio article were to have all the worthwhile and properly sourced information about her, however, it would be far too long. Therefore, the editors of the article have properly used summary style. The main article links to a daughter article concerning Cher albums discography, and that article links to articles about particular albums. It's an excellent way to make available a rich level of detail about Cher (which some readers would want) without surrendering to clutter that would impair Wikipedia's value for readers who want less detail. JamesMLane t c 08:52, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:07, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 18:27, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Besides three sentences in the Milwaukee Journal ("one of the true low spots of a conspicuously erratic career") [1] and a brief mention in Billboard ("paltry" and "schmaltzy") [2], I can't find sources that argue for the notability of this reissue. A footnote in the discography would cover it. Yappy2bhere (talk) 20:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.