Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitstamp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bitstamp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. There is no coverage except bitcoin related zines/trade journals, neither of which has even shown beyond doubt (to me at least) that is has editorial control and isn't just republishing press releases. Don't be fooled by Google News top "Forbes" hit - it is from Forbes Sites, de facto a blog without editorial control ("Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.". I will also point out to a related comment on a related AfD which is quite relevant here. In the end, I think this is just WP:CORPSPAM that does not belong in an encyclopedia. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:00, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate spam; this material belongs on the company web site, not here. A WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable tech business. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.