Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bite Me (novel)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:03, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bite Me (novel)[edit]
- Bite Me (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Contested PROD but does not meet WP:BK. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep, does meet WP:BK, both Criteria 1 and Criteria 5. It's a real book, written by a notable author, Christopher Moore, and published by by an imprint of HarperCollins, one of the largest publishing houses in the US. There's tons of media coverage by reliable sources out on the web. The article is currently in poor shape and it does need to be cleaned up, but that's not the same as meriting deletion.--Hongkongresident (talk) 00:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Clear keep per Hongkongresident, Sadads (talk) 15:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Just because the article doesn't prove coverage doesn't mean that it's not there. PrincessofLlyr royal court 17:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: No. 5 best selling novel in United States on NY Times bestseller list april 2010, plus other references.--Milowent • talkblp-r 18:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. —Shsilver (talk) 19:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep Morrow wouldn't publish a third book if the series wasn't working well. Notable publisher + high sales rank = notable book. Possibly could do with a bit more coverage, but until someone proves it a hoax, it's notable.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.