Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishwo Gautam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bishwo Gautam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any significant notability. Very strong possibility of COI editing. Author removed notability , ref improve and BLP sources tags without improving referencing at all. Two of the refs are interviews with the subject and the others are passing mentions. Nothing reliable and independent. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:38, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:47, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:47, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:48, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:48, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nomination. No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Hrodvarsson (talk) 18:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ^weak This article is so bad, the person described in the article and the probable author deserve this type of 'publicity'. If someone was paid to create this article, they need to get their money back. I am not convinced of the notability of the topic. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ ^{and Merry Christmas} 01:10, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 00:43, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Piling on, just to get this AfD closed. Ifnord (talk) 15:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.