Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishops Bridge Rural Fire Brigade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bduke (Discussion) 10:22, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bishops Bridge Rural Fire Brigade[edit]

non-notable volunteer fire brigade. Contested PROD Mattinbgn\^talk 20:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 20:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete unsourced, no apparent notability.Bali ultimate (talk) 23:05, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no coverage found through Google news search. Michellecrisp (talk) 01:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Happy ^Holidays 01:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable.--Grahame (talk) 01:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 02:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:CORP notability guidelines. Matt (Talk) 09:05, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:58, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Except for the most unusual cirsumstances, a volunteer fire department with one station and two apparatus is not going to be notable. Jclemens (talk) 05:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.