Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishop Allen and the Broken String

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, no redirect. --Core desat 02:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop Allen and the Broken String[edit]

This article has absolutely no content at all except for a vacant infobox and headers. I'm merely completing a malformed nom here, so I abstain. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 03:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, probably speedy A7 because the reference given as a link is to an unreliable blog. Placeholder account 04:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bishop Allen unless some actual information is added. According to WP:MUSIC, "If the musician or ensemble that made them is considered notable, then their albums have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." However, the article provides absolutely no context other than the infobox, so it should really just redirect to the band's article. -- Cielomobile ^{talk / contribs} 05:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --Haemo 07:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Doesn't that fall under A1 or A3? Whs itc hy 15:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep geez, the article was only created today. Presumably more information will be added soon. If the article stays empty for a month, then delete. Capmango 18:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy A3 Delete unless notable content is added by the end of this AfD. A1octopus 18:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't need a redirect, as the article title is an odd concatenation of group name and album name. According to the band's label, the album won't be released until next month. I'm guessing (and willing to be corrected) that the article was created and then abandoned? At any rate, assuming that if the album becomes notable, it should be listed under it's title, no? Not speaking to notability here of the group or album at all.... 216.201.119.71 21:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as information-free (inc. notability, sources. tomasz. 10:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.