Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birthmark (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dennis Brown - 23:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Birthmark (band)[edit]

Birthmark (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No source, nothing notable about this group. Should have been deleted ages ago. Glucken123 (talk) 15:30, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Glucken123 (talk) 15:30, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural Keep - No evidence that WP:BEFORE was followed and good evidence that it probably wasn't as this was part of a mass-nomination of dozens of articles about Greek culture over the course of a hour. FOARP (talk) 16:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 50 Spotify listeners and no notability. Do not confuse them with Nate Kinsella. Glucken123 (talk) 16:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Well, the "sourcing" in the article is crappy. No RS whatsoever, at least in the article. I have never heard about this band or the rest of the bands/musicians Glucken123 listed to AfD but I agree that they don't look notable. Although I agree with FOARP about the fact that @Glucken123: listed so many pages during just an hour is crazy. I think AfDs should always be made carefully because who knows, there might be some reliable sources despite not being shown in article. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 16:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Obviously promotional original research, since no sources can be found to verify the article content. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 23:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Another promotional article about non-notable musicians. --Micky (talk) 00:56, 21 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The creeper2007Talk! 22:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not one fact in this article is specifically cited to any source. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.