Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birmingham Crows

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Birmingham Crows

This is about a defunct social Australian rules football club formerly operating in England. It has no sources and no claims of notability. Wikipedia should not be used for this trivia. Grahame (talk) 12:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 12:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Taken in isolation, I agree that this article is rather light. However, in the broader context of British Australian Rules Football League (and its mirror article AFL Britain, but that's a different issue) it contributes to rounding-out the broader, more comprehensive article. WWGB (talk) 13:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing in the article proves notability. Unreferenced. Unverified.--Lester 03:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's a social sporting comp. Is the BARFL even notable? Different discussion, but it would seem that none of the teams are. Redirect to the league... then argue about deleting the league too!Ga rr ie 05:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing more than an oddity, and it would appear a struggling and possibly disappearing one at that. No claims to anything approaching notability. Murtoa (talk) 13:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.