Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birdeye

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 01:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birdeye[edit]

Birdeye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am using AFD as PROD is likely to be contested, and some of the references might be borderline on notability. References used are mostly routine coverage of the company - such as the company getting funding or launching a new feature. The company being featured in one of the awards didn't establish notability, as it is only mentioned in passing. In my opinion, this does not satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH and failed WP:GNG. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.