Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birdemic II: The Resurrection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Joseph Fox 01:42, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Birdemic II: The Resurrection

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:MOVIE. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Birdemic I only achieved notability by being one of the worst films ever made. Similarly, this one must wait until it has been released, panned by the critics and achieved cult status. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:13, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. This article may come back later by the time it gets released, but not today. Minima © (talk) 12:30, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFF. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 14:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect for now to the one place where per WP:NFF and WP:FUTURE this film merits a sourced mention (and IS already so mentioned): Birdemic#Sequel. I agree, it does not yet merit a seperate article. A redirect serves the community just fine. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:13, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.