Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bipasha (1962 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. Notabily has been clearly established, article has appropriate references.(non-admin closure) Dwaipayan (talk) 02:59, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bipasha (1962 film)[edit]

Bipasha (1962 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 12:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Keep - obvious keep. Passes WP:Notability. Casting and Director all are acclaimed in their own rights. Jethwarp (talk) 18:53, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - seems quite notable to me. The article needs work, and should be tagged for it. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 (talk) 09:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 (talk) 09:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
WP:INDAFD: Bipasha (1962) Agradoot Uttam Kumar Suchitra Sen
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.