Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bipartisan Report

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 22:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bipartisan Report[edit]

Bipartisan Report (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fake news site full of nonsense. There are long-term COI issues as well, including blatant whitewashing efforts. There are hardly any references, and I simply don't see any way this would ever be notable or encyclopedic enough for Wikipedia, even if more sources were to be added. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 19:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 19:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doing a google search there doesn't seem to be any coverage as per WP:GNG. Zoozaz1 (talk) 20:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.