Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biomedcom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 02:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Biomedcom[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short lived company, fails WP:NCORP. Tagged not notable since June 2018. References don't show notability: 2 are just directories, 1 is own website. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Bettydaisies (talk) 03:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A page on a consultancy company which was taken over by another, which itself appears to have been taken over by a firm named Certara, none of which have articles, so no redirect target. The .org website now promotes betting; there is a US-based .com which appears to belong to a different company. I am seeing no evidence that the firm attained notability. AllyD (talk) 10:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.