Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biofina
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 07:05, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Biofina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Company, with only a short mention in one short huff post article. The company seems to be very active with online media (publishing blogs, twitter, facebook, etc), and is probably pushing for SEO. However, aside from those types of SEO-related links, I can't find an incredible amount on this company via searching that would meet WP:N. I'd encourage other editors to look as well before !voting to see if I've missed anything. — Jess· Δ♥ 18:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable company; this article also seems to read like an advertisement... Cyan Gardevoir (used EDIT!) 05:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 05:49, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser TSU 01:54, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree - not notable - passing mention in Huffinton Post, nothing else found. Practically nothing even on own website.
- Also (if exists) should be disambiguated from Biofina SA (france) [1] which comes closer to notability but does make it either.Oranjblud (talk) 14:14, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.